Technology, Higher Education, and 'Power

Why A.I., V.R. and online learning could just as easily solidify as ameliorate academic inequities.
By Joshua Kim
You have /5 articles left.
Sign up for a free account or log in.
Power and Progress: Our Thousand-Year Struggle over Technology and Prosperity by Daron Acemoglu and Simon Johnson
Published in May of 2023.
Does technology advance higher education?
This question seems ridiculous to those of us who work in educational technology and online learning. Of course, technology pushes higher education forward. Who would want to go back to a pre-digital academia?
Picture a university without online courses, smart classrooms, learning management systems (LMS) and student information systems (SIS). How would things run?
What would we do all day long in academia without our laptops? We freak out when the WiFi goes down for a few minutes. Higher education without the internet is unimaginable.
As we rely on all these technologies, it is natural to assume that more and better technology will improve our higher ed work. The link between technological advance and progress seems so strong that we seldom pause to examine our beliefs about how these two areas are connected.
But what if we are all wrong? (Or at least those of us who work in and around technology and higher education are wrong).
The idea that progress is not a natural byproduct of technological advances forms the core argument of Acemoglu and Johnson’s fine new book, Power and Progress. The book takes a deep dive into the historical record of technological advances and improvements in the standard of living and finds the links between the two to be tenuous at best.
Contrary to what we think we know, the introduction of new technologies (from industrial to informational) is only weakly correlated with population-level improvements in well-being and health. Technological advances do not automatically lead to measures as diverse as reductions in poverty, improvements in average income, nutrition, health or life expectancy.
The historical record demonstrates that the benefits of new technologies accrue primarily to the socially powerful and existing economic elites.
Power and Progress moves from the medieval ages (where technology-created wealth got sucked into the Church and cathedral building and bypassed the peasants), to the Industrial Revolution and into the modern era. The shift from agriculture to manufacturing brought with it the rise of dehumanizing factory work and child labor. It is not the rise of industrial mass production that built a middle class, but rather the long fight to organize workers.
Anyone who claims that the rise of A.I. will be good for anyone but those who own (and profit from) large tech companies should read Power and Progress. A new economy undergirded by artificial intelligence could easily serve as an engine of further wealth concentration.
Thinking about where we have been and where we are going in higher education, the clear lesson from Power and Progress is that we should not expect new technologies to result in a more equitable and resilient postsecondary ecosystem.
If we want higher education to be an engine of mobility instead of a system that privileges the privileged, then the way forward is more political than technological. Academic leaders, even those at wealthy private institutions, can fight to restore public funding for public institutions.
What we can’t do is assume that the adoption of new technologies on campus (A.I., V.R., online education, etc.) will automatically translate into advancing our (laudable) institutional missions.
Reading and discussing Power and Progress may provide a way to have a different conversation about technology and education on our campuses.
What are you reading?

The mega–pop star’s impact on supply and demand, monopolies, and cost efficiencies make her prime teaching material f
Can the 19th-century Luddite movement help us think about the corporate digitization of education?
Care to share your career failures with our Inside Higher Ed community?
Can universities be a counterweight to a toxic achievement culture?
Subscribe for free to Inside Higher Ed’s newsletters, featuring the latest news, opinion and great new careers in higher education — delivered to your inbox.
View Newsletters
Copyright © 2024 Inside Higher Ed All rights reserved. | Website designed by nclud
4/5 Articles remaining
this month.

source Technologyindia Technologychina Technologyusa Technology
Canada Technologykuwait TechnologyAntigua and Barbuda
TechnologyArgentina TechnologyArmenia
Technology
Australia
TechnologyAustria
TechnologyAustrian Empire*
Azerbaijan
TechnologyBaden*
Bahamas, The
TechnologyBahrain
TechnologyBangladesh
TechnologyBarbados
TechnologyBavaria*
TechnologyBelarus
TechnologyBelgium
TechnologyBelize
TechnologyBenin (Dahomey)
TechnologyBolivia
TechnologyBosnia and Herzegovina
TechnologyBotswana
TechnologyBrazil
TechnologyBrunei
TechnologyBrunswick and Lüneburg*
TechnologyBulgaria
TechnologyBurkina Faso
TechnologyBurma
TechnologyBurundi
TechnologyCabo Verde
TechnologyCambodia
TechnologyCameroon
TechnologyCanada
TechnologyCayman Islands, The
TechnologyCentral African Republic
TechnologyCentral American Federation*
TechnologyChad
TechnologyChile
TechnologyChina
China
TechnologyColombia
TechnologyComoros
TechnologyCongo Free State, The*
TechnologyCosta Rica
TechnologyCote d’Ivoire
TechnologyCroatia
TechnologyCuba
TechnologyCyprus
TechnologyCzechia
TechnologyCzechoslovakia*
TechnologyDemocratic Republic of the Congo
TechnologyDenmark
TechnologyDjibouti
TechnologyDominica
TechnologyDominican Republic
TechnologyDuchy of Parma, The*
TechnologyEast Germany German Democratic Republic*
TechnologyEcuador
TechnologyEgypt
TechnologyEl Salvador
TechnologyEquatorial Guinea
TechnologyEritrea
TechnologyEstonia
TechnologyEswatini
TechnologyEthiopia
TechnologyFederal Government of Germany *
TechnologyFiji
TechnologyFinland
Technologyindia Technologychina Technologyusa Technology
Canada Technologykuwait TechnologyAntigua and Barbuda
TechnologyArgentina TechnologyArmenia
Technology
Australia
TechnologyAustria
TechnologyAustrian Empire*
Azerbaijan
TechnologyBaden*
Bahamas, The
TechnologyBahrain
TechnologyBangladesh
TechnologyBarbados
TechnologyBavaria*
TechnologyBelarus
TechnologyBelgium
TechnologyBelize
TechnologyBenin (Dahomey)
TechnologyBolivia
TechnologyBosnia and Herzegovina
TechnologyBotswana
TechnologyBrazil
TechnologyBrunei
TechnologyBrunswick and Lüneburg*
TechnologyBulgaria
TechnologyBurkina Faso (Upper Volta)
TechnologyBurma
TechnologyBurundi
TechnologyCabo Verde
TechnologyCambodia
TechnologyCameroon
TechnologyCanada
TechnologyCayman Islands, The
TechnologyCentral African Republic
TechnologyCentral American Federation*
TechnologyChad
TechnologyChile
TechnologyChina
China
TechnologyColombia
TechnologyComoros
TechnologyCongo Free State, The*
TechnologyCosta Rica
TechnologyCote d’Ivoire
TechnologyCroatia
TechnologyCuba
TechnologyCyprus
TechnologyCzechia
TechnologyCzechoslovakia*
TechnologyDemocratic Republic of the Congo
TechnologyDenmark
TechnologyDjibouti
TechnologyDominica
TechnologyDominican Republic
TechnologyDuchy of Parma, The*
TechnologyEast Germany
TechnologyEcuador
TechnologyEgypt
TechnologyEl Salvador
TechnologyEquatorial Guinea
TechnologyEritrea
TechnologyEstonia
TechnologyEswatini
TechnologyEthiopia
TechnologyFederal Government of Germany *
TechnologyFiji
TechnologyFinland
Why A.I., V.R. and online learning could just as easily solidify as ameliorate academic inequities.
By Joshua Kim
You have /5 articles left.
Sign up for a free account or log in.
Power and Progress: Our Thousand-Year Struggle over Technology and Prosperity by Daron Acemoglu and Simon Johnson
Published in May of 2023.
Does technology advance higher education?
This question seems ridiculous to those of us who work in educational technology and online learning. Of course, technology pushes higher education forward. Who would want to go back to a pre-digital academia?
Picture a university without online courses, smart classrooms, learning management systems (LMS) and student information systems (SIS). How would things run?
What would we do all day long in academia without our laptops? We freak out when the WiFi goes down for a few minutes. Higher education without the internet is unimaginable.
As we rely on all these technologies, it is natural to assume that more and better technology will improve our higher ed work. The link between technological advance and progress seems so strong that we seldom pause to examine our beliefs about how these two areas are connected.
But what if we are all wrong? (Or at least those of us who work in and around technology and higher education are wrong).
The idea that progress is not a natural byproduct of technological advances forms the core argument of Acemoglu and Johnson’s fine new book, Power and Progress. The book takes a deep dive into the historical record of technological advances and improvements in the standard of living and finds the links between the two to be tenuous at best.
Contrary to what we think we know, the introduction of new technologies (from industrial to informational) is only weakly correlated with population-level improvements in well-being and health. Technological advances do not automatically lead to measures as diverse as reductions in poverty, improvements in average income, nutrition, health or life expectancy.
The historical record demonstrates that the benefits of new technologies accrue primarily to the socially powerful and existing economic elites.
Power and Progress moves from the medieval ages (where technology-created wealth got sucked into the Church and cathedral building and bypassed the peasants), to the Industrial Revolution and into the modern era. The shift from agriculture to manufacturing brought with it the rise of dehumanizing factory work and child labor. It is not the rise of industrial mass production that built a middle class, but rather the long fight to organize workers.
Anyone who claims that the rise of A.I. will be good for anyone but those who own (and profit from) large tech companies should read Power and Progress. A new economy undergirded by artificial intelligence could easily serve as an engine of further wealth concentration.
Thinking about where we have been and where we are going in higher education, the clear lesson from Power and Progress is that we should not expect new technologies to result in a more equitable and resilient postsecondary ecosystem.
If we want higher education to be an engine of mobility instead of a system that privileges the privileged, then the way forward is more political than technological. Academic leaders, even those at wealthy private institutions, can fight to restore public funding for public institutions.
What we can’t do is assume that the adoption of new technologies on campus (A.I., V.R., online education, etc.) will automatically translate into advancing our (laudable) institutional missions.
Reading and discussing Power and Progress may provide a way to have a different conversation about technology and education on our campuses.
What are you reading?

Real-prop-india

Search This Blog

Technology, Higher Education, and 'Power

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

ముప్పు ముంగిట చంద్రయాన్-3 ల్యాండర్, రోవర్.. ఇస్రోలో ఆందోళన - సమయం తెలుగు (Samayam Telugu)

Telugu cinema posters get a digital makeover! | Telugu Movie News - TOI Etimes

Apple wins over AliveCor antitrust lawsuit ov