Skip to main content

EU antitrust chief does not trust Big Tech to

To enjoy additional benefits
CONNECT WITH US
February 09, 2024 09:41 am | Updated 09:41 am IST – BRUSSELS
COMMents
SHARE
READ LATER
Google, Apple, Amazon, Meta, Microsoft and ByteDance will have to adapt their core platform services [File] | Photo Credit: REUTERS
EU antitrust chief Margrethe Vestager on Thursday voiced doubts as to whether Big Tech will fully comply with landmark EU rules aimed at reining in their power and ensure a level playing field for smaller rivals.
"I have reservations as to whether or not we will have full compliance," Vestager told a news conference, a sign that she may open investigations into some of the companies in the coming months.
Alphabet's Google, Apple, Amazon , Meta Platforms, Microsoft and ByteDance will have to adapt their core platform services to comply with the Digital Markets Act (DMA) on March 7.
(For top technology news of the day, subscribe to our tech newsletter Today’s Cache)
The six companies have been designated as gatekeepers under the DMA. Vestager said she hoped the companies will listen to feedback from third parties on their proposals on how to comply with the DMA and assess changes.
COMMents
SHARE
technology (general) / internet / European Union
BACK TO TOPBack to Top
Terms & conditions  |  Institutional Subscriber
Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.
We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.

sourceEU antitruindiaEU antitruchinaEU antitruusaEU antitru
Canada
EU antitrukuwaitEU antitruAntigua and Barbuda
EU antitruArgentinaEU antitruArmenia
EU antitru
Australia
EU antitruAustria
EU antitruAustrian Empire*
Azerbaijan
EU antitruBaden*
Bahamas, The
EU antitruBahrain
EU antitruBangladesh
EU antitruBarbados
EU antitruBavaria*
EU antitruBelarus
EU antitruBelgium
EU antitruBelize
EU antitruBenin (Dahomey)
EU antitruBolivia
EU antitruBosnia and Herzegovina
EU antitruBotswana
EU antitruBrazil
EU antitruBrunei
EU antitruBrunswick and Lüneburg*
EU antitruBulgaria
EU antitruBurkina Faso
EU antitruBurma
EU antitruBurundi
EU antitruCabo Verde
EU antitruCambodia
EU antitruCameroon
EU antitruCanada
EU antitruCayman Islands, The
EU antitruCentral African Republic
EU antitruCentral American Federation*
EU antitruChad
EU antitruChile
EU antitruChina
China
EU antitruColombia
EU antitruComoros
EU antitruCongo Free State, The*
EU antitruCosta Rica
EU antitruCote d’Ivoire
EU antitruCroatia
EU antitruCuba
EU antitruCyprus
EU antitruCzechia
EU antitruCzechoslovakia*
EU antitruDemocratic Republic of the Congo
EU antitruDenmark
EU antitruDjibouti
EU antitruDominica
EU antitruDominican Republic
EU antitruDuchy of Parma, The*
EU antitruEast Germany German Democratic Republic*
EU antitruEcuador
EU antitruEgypt
EU antitruEl Salvador
EU antitruEquatorial Guinea
EU antitruEritrea
EU antitruEstonia
EU antitruEswatini
EU antitruEthiopia
EU antitruFederal Government of Germany *
EU antitruFiji
EU antitruFinland
EU antitruindiaEU antitruchinaEU antitruusaEU antitru
Canada
EU antitrukuwaitEU antitruAntigua and Barbuda
EU antitruArgentinaEU antitruArmenia
EU antitru
Australia
EU antitruAustria
EU antitruAustrian Empire*
Azerbaijan
EU antitruBaden*
Bahamas, The
EU antitruBahrain
EU antitruBangladesh
EU antitruBarbados
EU antitruBavaria*
EU antitruBelarus
EU antitruBelgium
EU antitruBelize
EU antitruBenin (Dahomey)
EU antitruBolivia
EU antitruBosnia and Herzegovina
EU antitruBotswana
EU antitruBrazil
EU antitruBrunei
EU antitruBrunswick and Lüneburg*
EU antitruBulgaria
EU antitruBurkina Faso (Upper Volta)
EU antitruBurma
EU antitruBurundi
EU antitruCabo Verde
EU antitruCambodia
EU antitruCameroon
EU antitruCanada
EU antitruCayman Islands, The
EU antitruCentral African Republic
EU antitruCentral American Federation*
EU antitruChad
EU antitruChile
EU antitruChina
China
EU antitruColombia
EU antitruComoros
EU antitruCongo Free State, The*
EU antitruCosta Rica
EU antitruCote d’Ivoire
EU antitruCroatia
EU antitruCuba
EU antitruCyprus
EU antitruCzechia
EU antitruCzechoslovakia*
EU antitruDemocratic Republic of the Congo
EU antitruDenmark
EU antitruDjibouti
EU antitruDominica
EU antitruDominican Republic
EU antitruDuchy of Parma, The*
EU antitruEast Germany
EU antitruEcuador
EU antitruEgypt
EU antitruEl Salvador
EU antitruEquatorial Guinea
EU antitruEritrea
EU antitruEstonia
EU antitruEswatini
EU antitruEthiopia
EU antitruFederal Government of Germany *
EU antitruFiji
EU antitruFinland
To enjoy additional benefits
CONNECT WITH US
February 09, 2024 09:41 am | Updated 09:41 am IST – BRUSSELS
COMMents
SHARE
READ LATER
Google, Apple, Amazon, Meta, Microsoft and ByteDance will have to adapt their core platform services [File] | Photo Credit: REUTERS
EU antitrust chief Margrethe Vestager on Thursday voiced doubts as to whether Big Tech will fully comply with landmark EU rules aimed at reining in their power and ensure a level playing field for smaller rivals.
"I have reservations as to whether or not we will have full compliance," Vestager told a news conference, a sign that she may open investigations into some of the companies in the coming months.
Alphabet's Google, Apple, Amazon , Meta Platforms, Microsoft and ByteDance will have to adapt their core platform services to comply with the Digital Markets Act (DMA) on March 7.
(For top technology news of the day, subscribe to our tech newsletter Today’s Cache)
The six companies have been designated as gatekeepers under the DMA. Vestager said she hoped the companies will listen to feedback from third parties on their proposals on how to comply with the DMA and assess changes.
COMMents
SHARE
technology (general) / internet / European Union
BACK TO TOPBack to Top
Terms & conditions  |  Institutional Subscriber
Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.
We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.

sourceEU antitruindiaEU antitruchinaEU antitruusaEU antitru
Canada
EU antitrukuwaitEU antitruAntigua and Barbuda
EU antitruArgentinaEU antitruArmenia
EU antitru
Australia
EU antitruAustria
EU antitruAustrian Empire*
Azerbaijan
EU antitruBaden*
Bahamas, The
EU antitruBahrain
EU antitruBangladesh
EU antitruBarbados
EU antitruBavaria*
EU antitruBelarus
EU antitruBelgium
EU antitruBelize
EU antitruBenin (Dahomey)
EU antitruBolivia
EU antitruBosnia and Herzegovina
EU antitruBotswana
EU antitruBrazil
EU antitruBrunei
EU antitruBrunswick and Lüneburg*
EU antitruBulgaria
EU antitruBurkina Faso
EU antitruBurma
EU antitruBurundi
EU antitruCabo Verde
EU antitruCambodia
EU antitruCameroon
EU antitruCanada
EU antitruCayman Islands, The
EU antitruCentral African Republic
EU antitruCentral American Federation*
EU antitruChad
EU antitruChile
EU antitruChina
China
EU antitruColombia
EU antitruComoros
EU antitruCongo Free State, The*
EU antitruCosta Rica
EU antitruCote d’Ivoire
EU antitruCroatia
EU antitruCuba
EU antitruCyprus
EU antitruCzechia
EU antitruCzechoslovakia*
EU antitruDemocratic Republic of the Congo
EU antitruDenmark
EU antitruDjibouti
EU antitruDominica
EU antitruDominican Republic
EU antitruDuchy of Parma, The*
EU antitruEast Germany German Democratic Republic*
EU antitruEcuador
EU antitruEgypt
EU antitruEl Salvador
EU antitruEquatorial Guinea
EU antitruEritrea
EU antitruEstonia
EU antitruEswatini
EU antitruEthiopia
EU antitruFederal Government of Germany *
EU antitruFiji
EU antitruFinland
EU antitruindiaEU antitruchinaEU antitruusaEU antitru
Canada
EU antitrukuwaitEU antitruAntigua and Barbuda
EU antitruArgentinaEU antitruArmenia
EU antitru
Australia
EU antitruAustria
EU antitruAustrian Empire*
Azerbaijan
EU antitruBaden*
Bahamas, The
EU antitruBahrain
EU antitruBangladesh
EU antitruBarbados
EU antitruBavaria*
EU antitruBelarus
EU antitruBelgium
EU antitruBelize
EU antitruBenin (Dahomey)
EU antitruBolivia
EU antitruBosnia and Herzegovina
EU antitruBotswana
EU antitruBrazil
EU antitruBrunei
EU antitruBrunswick and Lüneburg*
EU antitruBulgaria
EU antitruBurkina Faso (Upper Volta)
EU antitruBurma
EU antitruBurundi
EU antitruCabo Verde
EU antitruCambodia
EU antitruCameroon
EU antitruCanada
EU antitruCayman Islands, The
EU antitruCentral African Republic
EU antitruCentral American Federation*
EU antitruChad
EU antitruChile
EU antitruChina
China
EU antitruColombia
EU antitruComoros
EU antitruCongo Free State, The*
EU antitruCosta Rica
EU antitruCote d’Ivoire
EU antitruCroatia
EU antitruCuba
EU antitruCyprus
EU antitruCzechia
EU antitruCzechoslovakia*
EU antitruDemocratic Republic of the Congo
EU antitruDenmark
EU antitruDjibouti
EU antitruDominica
EU antitruDominican Republic
EU antitruDuchy of Parma, The*
EU antitruEast Germany
EU antitruEcuador
EU antitruEgypt
EU antitruEl Salvador
EU antitruEquatorial Guinea
EU antitruEritrea
EU antitruEstonia
EU antitruEswatini
EU antitruEthiopia
EU antitruFederal Government of Germany *
EU antitruFiji
EU antitruFinland

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Apple wins over AliveCor antitrust lawsuit ov

Apple has finally got a win over the ongoing legal battle with AliveCor, the US-based medical device company over the Apple Watch's heart monitoring technology. AliveCor had accused the tech giant for limiting third-party access to specific heart rate data which is collected by the Apple Watch, claiming that it was an anti-competitive move. However, a judge in a US District Court has ruled completely in favour of Apple, stating that the company is not required to stand trial for the lawsuit In the 9to5Mac report, Apple's spokesperson w...